Cases 11 - 20 of 176
Hall v. Payne
as 4:2022cv00457
Plaintiff:
Neal Hall and Neil Allen Hall
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curtis et al v. Taylor et al
as 4:2022cv00328
Plaintiff:
Larry Curtis, Margie Curtis and Dwight Houston
Defendant:
Larry Taylor, Billy Burris, Asa Hutchinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Neal v. Family Dollar Services LLC
as 3:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Neal
Defendant:
Family Dollar Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Cunningham v. Benge et al
as 4:2022cv00349
Plaintiff:
James Daniel Cunningham
Defendant:
Benge, Page, Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Sickler et al
as 4:2022cv00410
Plaintiff:
Neal Allen Hall
Defendant:
Jason Sickler, United States Justice Department and Does South Central Regional Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons; Director, Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis et al v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 3:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Holly Cristen Ellis and Jeremy Edward Ellis
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Asa Hutchinson, Keith Chrestman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Neal v. Payne
as 4:2021cv01185
Plaintiff:
Delvin Neal
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Neal v. Walker et al
as 4:2021cv04068
Plaintiff:
Micah Lance Neal
Defendant:
Warden Jeffie Walker, Captain Golden Adams, Lt. Alice Weaver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Staley et al
as 4:2021cv00888
Plaintiff:
Neil Clem and Chad Neal
Defendant:
John Staley and Kristi Flud
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
French v. Tatum et al
as 2:2021cv00134
Plaintiff:
Crystal French
Defendant:
Angela Tatum, Chrssy Tucker, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
