Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Morgan v. Leeow et al
as 1:2017cv02003
Defendant:
DEANGELA BOYAN, DWENGER, DOCTOR LEEOW and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN B. MORGAN
Miscellaneou:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(COURT USE ONLY)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Leeow et al
as 3:2017cv00225
Plaintiff:
Christian B Morgan
Defendant:
Doctor Leeow, DeAngela Boyan, Dwenger and others
Miscellaneous_party:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GATES v. COLE et al
as 1:2016cv02910
Defendant:
BUCKNER, COLE, DR CONDIS and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN GATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLLY v. CORIZON, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv01410
Defendant:
VICKI BURDINE, KEITH BUTTS, CORIZON, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HOLLY
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SISK v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2015cv01790
Defendant:
ALLEN, ANDERSON, ARAMARK and others
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SISK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00073
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Nance v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv01851
Plaintiff:
Rita Nance
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet Manufacturing Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NANCE v. CITY OF ELWOOD et al
as 1:2014cv00359
Defendant:
MAYOR RONALD ARNOLD, CITY OF ELWOOD and CHIEF OF POLICE SAM HANNA
Plaintiff:
DANIEL NANCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NANCE v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 2:2014cv00024
Petitioner:
SOLLIE NANCE
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NANCE v. CARNEYGEE
as 1:2010cv01399
Respondent:
DONNA R. CARNEYGEE
Petitioner:
WILLIAM NANCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
