Cases 11 - 20 of 66
Ruffin v. Pierce County Council et al
as 3:2023cv06044
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Dwayne Ruffin
Defendant:
Pierce County Council, Patty Jackson and NaphCare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter-Shabazz v. Pierce County Council et al
as 3:2023cv06045
Plaintiff:
Mumit Xh Carter-Shabazz
Defendant:
Pierce County Council, NaphCare, Patty Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickens v. NaphCare
as 3:2023cv05934
Plaintiff:
Joshua A Dickens
Defendant:
NaphCare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rudolph v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05856
Plaintiff:
Brandon Neil Rudolph
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Byrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estes v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05749
Plaintiff:
Jacy Joe Estes
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LeAir v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05738
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Grey LeAir
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rozier v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05724
Plaintiff:
Timothy Eugene Rozier
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Sieverson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonds v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05720
Plaintiff:
Zakery Michael Bonds
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Severson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Benton County et al
as 2:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Bryan Paul Hernandez
Defendant:
County of Benton, NaphCare Inc and Eastern State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Widland v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05719
Plaintiff:
Brian Douglas Widland, Jr
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
