Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 525
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01908
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Moran-Munoz v. Garland et al
as 3:2024cv00373
Petitioner: Javier Moran-Munoz
Respondent: Merrick Garland, Ronald L. Davis, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00375
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00230
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
USA v. Robert Looney, Jr.
as 24-10377
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: ROBERT NOONAN LOONEY, JR.
Rush v. Noonan et al
as 1:2024cv00023
Plaintiff: Karan Terrell Rush
Defendant: CO Patrick Noonan, Sgt Anderson, CO Juan Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wetsell v. Summit Materials, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03167
Plaintiff: Keith Wetsell
Defendant: Summit Materials, Inc., Howard L. Lance, Anne Noonan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Juarez v. Noonan
as 2:2023cv01246
Plaintiff: David C Juarez
Defendant: Patric J Noonan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edward Clark v. State of California, et al
as 23-55715
Plaintiff / Appellant: EDWARD L. CLARK
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LON HURWITZ, Superior Court Judge, individual and official capacity, YOLANDA V. TORRES, Superior Court Judge, individual and official capacity and others
NOONAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv07380
Plaintiff: ERIC NOONAN
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?