Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Lochetto v. McRae
as 1:2021cv00577
Defendant:
Gregory McRae and Chaplain Richards
Plaintiff:
Anthony M Lochetto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harry v. Gilmore et al
as 2:2021cv00230
Defendant:
K. Cosby, Ivan Gilmore, E. Boone and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Harry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McElroy v. Clarke et al
as 7:2021cv00091
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, I.M.P. Sykes, Warden Kaiser and others
Plaintiff:
Carnell Dion McElroy and Carnell Dion McElroy, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Fleming et al
as 2:2020cv00638
Defendant:
Ms. Harris, Intel Officer M. Perry, A. David Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houston v. Bolster et al
as 2:2019cv00552
Defendant:
Warden Bolster, SHU Supervisor, Chaplain Houston and others
Plaintiff:
Darien Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wilson v. The Secretary of the Navy, et al
as 2:2019cv00515
Plaintiff:
Barby Earl Wilson
Defendant:
The Navy Chief of Chaplains, The Chief of Naval Personnel and The Secretary of the Navy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
George v. Moore et al
as 7:2019cv00631
Defendant:
Dr. P. Moore, Grace on the Inside, Dr. Fox and others
Plaintiff:
Destined C.M.D. George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lancaster et al v. Secretary of the Navy et al
as 2:2019cv00095
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dufour, Andrew Calhoun, Timothy Demy and others
Defendant:
The Secretary of the Navy, The Chief of Naval Personnel and The Navy Chief of Chaplains
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Coleman v. Jones et al
as 1:2018cv00931
Defendant:
Major Johnson, Chaplain Schwarpzlow and Sgt. Jones
Plaintiff:
Deaullandy Goran Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sirleaf, Jr v. Clarke et al
as 3:2018cv00311
Plaintiff:
Priest Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Jr
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, A. Davide Robinson, Mark E. Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
