Cases 11 - 20 of 97
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02178
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Lynum v. Ohio Bell Telephone Company et al
as 1:2019cv01829
Plaintiff:
Jay Lynum
Defendant:
Ohio Bell Telephone Company and Adam Menough
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Jodi Fleming v. Ohio Bell Telephone Company, et al
as 19-3567
Defendant / Appellee:
CEO RANDALL STEPHENSON, JAMES TENCH, Senior Manager, WILLIAM A. BLASE, JR., Vice President of Human Resources and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JODI D. FLEMING
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01181
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01125
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 2011
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00994
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Jodi Fleming v. Ohio Bell Telephone Company
as 19-3203
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JODI D. FLEMING
Defendant / Appellee:
OHIO BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
Sprint Communications Co. L.P. v. United Telephone Co. of Ohio, et al
as 18-10827
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED TELEPHONE COMPANY OF OHIO, doing business as CenturyLink, OHIO BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, TELEPHONE SERVICE COMPANY and others
MCI Communications Svc Inc., et al v. CenturyTel of Ohio, Inc., et al
as 18-10778
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INCORPORATED and VERIZON SELECT SERVICES INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
CENTURYTEL OF OHIO, INCORPORATED, CONNEAUT TELEPHONE COMPANY, DOYLESTOWN TELEPHONE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
