Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Harold Kanupp v. Piedmont Correctional
as 14-6853
Petitioner - Appellant:
HAROLD DEAN KANUPP
Respondent - Appellee:
PIEDMONT CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Kanupp v. Piedmont Correctional Institute
as 1:2014cv00087
Petitioner:
Harold Dean Kanupp
Respondent:
Piedmont Correctional Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOINER V. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY et al
as 1:2013cv00933
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND DAKIM HARRIS JOINER
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, PIEDMONT CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, JENNIFER HARRIS and others
Joiner v. Department of Public Safety et al
as 1:2013cv02507
Plaintiff:
Raymond Dakim Harris Joiner
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety, Piedmont Correctional Institution, Jennifer Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOINER v. PIEDMONT CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 1:2013cv00669
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND DAKIM HARRIS JOINER
Defendant:
PIEDMONT CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MONTEHERMOSO v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2012cv00302
Plaintiff:
HAIBER MONTEHERMOSO
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF PRISONS, PIEDMONT CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MONTEHERMOSO V. NC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL
as 1:2009cv00393
Plaintiff:
HAIBER MONTEHERMOSO
Defendant:
NC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NC Division of Prisons, PIEDMONT CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montehermoso v. NC Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2009cv00056
Plaintiff:
Haiber Montehermoso
Defendant:
NC Department of Corrections, NC Division of Prisons, Piedmont Correctional Institute and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Harbison v. Bennett et al
as 3:2008cv00499
Plaintiff:
Larry Donnell Harbison
Defendant:
Boyd Bennett, Roger Patterson, Hattie Bimponq and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
