Cases
Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Scarborough Citizens Protect, et al v. US Fish and Wildlife Service, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1597
Plaintiff - Appellant: SCARBOROUGH CITIZENS PROTECTING RESOURCES, DAVID T. PAUL, PAUL AUSTIN and others
Defendant - Appellee: US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, NORTHEAST REGIONAL DIRECTOR, GOVERNOR, STATE OF MAINE and others
SCARBOROUGH CITIZENS PROTECTING RESOURCES et al v. US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00315
Plaintiff: SCARBOROUGH CITIZENS PROTECTING RESOURCES , DAVID T PAUL , PAUL AUSTIN and others
Defendant: US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, NORTHEAST REGIONAL DIRECTOR, GOVERNOR, STATE OF MAINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
AUSTIN v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv60949
Plaintiff: MICHAEL PAUL AUSTIN, SR.
Defendant: OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Fields et al v. Jayco, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv08185
Plaintiff: Glorine M. Fields, Glorine M. Fields, Glorine M. Fields and others
Defendant: Jayco, Inc., Bechtel Corporation, CH2M Hill, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOWARD et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv74152
Plaintiff: CLARA H. HOWARD, LOTTIE AUSTIN, MARIAN HODGES and others
Defendant: OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, FIBREBOARD CORPORATION, FIBREBOARD CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
Austin v. LaVergne Police Department et al
as 3:2008cv00040
Plaintiff: Millard Paul Austin
Defendant: LaVergne Police Department, City of LaVergne, Ted W. Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?