Cases 11 - 20 of 31
PINKOWSKI v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2017cv12134
Plaintiff:
ALEXIS PINKOWSKI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Alley Cat Inc et al v. Duncan
as 2:2016cv02745
Plaintiff:
Alley Cat Inc, Nicholas Pinkowski and Tough House Media Inc.
Defendant:
Stuart Duncan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Pinkowski v. USA
as 3:2015cv02260
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jerome Pinkowski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
PINKOWSKY v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv04663
Plaintiff:
DANIEL PINKOWSKY
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reflex Media, Inc. et al v. Oligarch, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv01147
Defendant:
Cobia Systems, Inc., DMA Financial Corp., Forlex Sales, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Infostream Group, Inc. and Reflex Media, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Pinkowski et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv05917
Plaintiff:
Eileen M. Pinkowski and Steven Pinkowski
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation , C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv06003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv06001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv06002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv06707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
