Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv04411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Matthews v. National Seating & Mobility, Inc. et al
as 0:2016cv60798
Defendant:
Pride Mobility Products Corporation and National Seating & Mobility, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Clarence Matthews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Black v. Pride Mobility Products Corporation
as 2:2015cv02008
Defendant:
Pride Mobility Products Corporation and United Seating and Mobility, LLC
Plaintiff:
Lea Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cess et al v. Pride Mobility Products Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv01276
Plaintiff:
Patricia Cess and Robert Cess
Defendant:
Pride Mobility Products Corporation and Quantum Rehab Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pride Mobility Products Corp. v. Permobil, Inc.
as 15-1586
Appellee:
PERMOBIL, INC.
Appellant:
PRIDE MOBILITY PRODUCTS CORPORATION
Pride Mobility Products Corp. v. Permobil, Inc.
as 15-1585
Appellee:
PERMOBIL, INC.
Appellant:
PRIDE MOBILITY PRODUCTS CORPORATION
Permobil, Inc. v. Pride Mobility Products Corpor
as 15-1278
Appellant:
PERMOBIL, INC.
Appellee:
PRIDE MOBILITY PRODUCTS CORPORATION
PRIDE MOBILITY PRODUCTS CORPORATION v. GOLDEN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
as 2:2013cv02984
Plaintiff:
PRIDE MOBILITY PRODUCTS CORPORATION
Defendant:
GOLDEN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183 Patent Infringement
PRIDE MOBILITY PRODUCTS CORPORATION v. PERMOBIL, INC.
as 2:2013cv01999
Plaintiff:
PRIDE MOBILITY PRODUCTS CORPORATION
Defendant:
PERMOBIL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Smith et al v. Scooter Store et al
as 5:2012cv02232
Plaintiff:
Sue J. Smith and Donald Smith
Defendant:
Scooter Store , Pride Mobility Products Corporation and State of Ohio, Department of Job and Family Services
Cross_defendant:
Scooter Store and Pride Mobility Products Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
