Cases
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Knight v. Wilkinson et al
as 7:2012cv00463
Respondent: Mr. Brown, Mr. Donnie Carter, Ms. Tracey E. Paner and others
Petitioner: Wilmer Jerome Knight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Craddock v. Fisher et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00430
Plaintiff: Orillion Craddock
Defendant: Clyd N. Fisher, Scott Leonard and Richmond City Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haywood Hendricks, Jr. v. Bryan Noswood
as 12-6931
Plaintiff - Appellant: HAYWOOD HENDRICKS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: BRYAN T. NOSWOOD, Richmond City Police Department and THIESSY G. DUPUIS, Receiving Colonel Chief
Vaughn v. City of Richmond et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00153
Plaintiff: Tariq A. Vaughn, Sr.
Defendant: City of Richmond, Richmond City Police Department, Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00849
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Zakiya Vaughn v. United States Government (FBI), et al
as 08-17226
Plaintiff - Appellant: ZAKIYA VAUGHN, as an individual and Guardian Ad Litem for minors, Jamonte Vaughn, Jamarco Vaughn, Jalen Vaughn
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT (FBI), SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF, SACRAMENTO CITY POLICE and others
Crosby v. Richmond City Police Officer Godwin
as 2:2008cv00171
Petitioner: Michael F. Crosby
Respondent: Richmond City Police Officer Godwin
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Turner v. Richmond City Police Department et al
as 2:2007cv00304
Plaintiff: Raymond D. Turner
Defendant: Richmond City Police Department and Richmond City Jail, et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?