Cases 11 - 20 of 40
HARPER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv89801
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HARPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARPER JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv09189
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HARPER JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams et al v. Rios et al
as 2:2020cv00085
Defendant:
Southern Aviation Transport Inc and Celso Rios
Plaintiff:
Rabian Shackelford, Robert Harper, Norrick Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARPER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv57475
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HARPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARPER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv39767
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HARPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARPER v. AMAZON.COM SERVICES, INC. et al
as 3:2019cv21735
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10 and AMAZON.COM SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HARPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARPER v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2018cv06193
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HARPER
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Albarado et al v. City of Abilene et al
as 1:2015cv00220
Plaintiff:
Juan Manuel Albarado, Anita Lou Guajardo and Juan Victor Albarado
Defendant:
City of Abilene, Taylor County, James Edison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. Colvin
as 4:2015cv01764
Plaintiff:
Robert Harper
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Harper v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv00087
Plaintiff:
Robert Harper
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
