Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Murphy v. Ford et al
as 5:2021cv00184
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Murphy
Defendant:
Roger Ford, Marshall County Detention Center, Shawn Goard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Cota v. USDC-NVR
as 21-71383
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MICHAEL COTA, RYAN YOUNG and NADINE CHRZANOWSKI
Petitioner:
MICHAEL COTA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, RENO
YOUNG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv52679
Plaintiff:
RYAN YOUNG
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Cota v. USDC-NVR
as 21-71278
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MICHAEL COTA, RYAN YOUNG, NADINE CHRZANOWSKI and others
Petitioner:
MICHAEL COTA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, RENO
Cota v. John Doe
as 3:2021cv00350
Plaintiff:
Mike Cota
Defendant:
John Doe, Ryan Young and Nadine Chrzanowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunn v. Fontenot et al
as 6:2021cv01535
Defendant:
John Doe, Randy Fontenot, City of Eunice and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Young
as 21-1086
Defendant:
Ryan Young, AKA Richard Cullen
Appellee:
United States of America
Appellant:
International Payout Systems, Inc.
United States of America v. Young
as 21-777
Defendant:
Ryan Young, AKA Richard Cullen
Appellant:
Chexx (Americas) Inc., Accu-Rate Corp. and PacNet Services Ltd
Appellee:
United States of America
YOUNG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv08430
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Atsas v. Bowen et al
as 4:2021cv00366
Defendant:
matthew l bowen, Campbell City School District Board of Education, Ryan Young and others
Plaintiff:
phillip s atsas and Phillip S. Atsas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
