Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Smith v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv01123
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ransom Smith
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bradford v. Baker et al
as 5:2011cv00564
Plaintiff:
Waylen Craig Bradford
Defendant:
James Baker, Tom Watson, Courtney Ransom and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ransom et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2010cv03492
Plaintiff:
Tara L Ransom , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, Defendant's Liaison Counsel and Defendant's Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Swann v. Baker et al
as 5:2010cv03357
Plaintiff:
Lucas Coy Swann
Defendant:
James Baker, Tom Watson, Courtney Ransom and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Bradford v. Baker et al
as 5:2010cv03217
Plaintiff:
Waylen Craig Bradford
Defendant:
James Baker, Tom Watson, Courtney Ransom and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dotson v. Baker et al
as 5:2010cv03112
Plaintiff:
David Keith Dotson
Defendant:
James Baker, Courtney Ransom, Tom Watson and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ransom v. United States of America
as 2:2008cv08051
Petitioner:
Don Rudell Ransom
Respondent:
United States of America, United States of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv01561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ransom v. Astrue (CONSENT)
as 2:2008cv00214
Plaintiff:
James A. Ransom, James A. Ransom, James A. Ransom and others
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Ransom v. Shelton
as 2:2007cv00059
Plaintiff:
Anastasia Channell Ransom
Defendant:
Michelle Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
