Cases 11 - 20 of 102
Miller v. G.C.R.C.F. et al
as 1:2022cv00096
Plaintiff:
Ray Charles Miller
Defendant:
G.C.R.C.F., Bobby C. Fairley, Burie Caine and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Daniels v. Cates
as 2:2022cv00229
Petitioner:
Ray Charles Daniels
Respondent:
B. Gates and B. Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACKSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv02430
Plaintiff:
RAY CHARLES JACKSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JACKSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv02415
Plaintiff:
RAY CHARLES JACKSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Turner v. Pacific Garden Mission et al
as 1:2021cv02204
Defendant:
Sampson Green, James Ford, Jr., Larry Roches and others
Plaintiff:
Ethan Wayne Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PAYNE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv12203
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RAY CHARLES PAYNE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHARLES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv10587
Plaintiff:
RYAN DEVIN RAY CHARLES
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hawkins v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2021cv00053
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Ray Charles Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00788
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Maxum Indemnity Company v. Jerry and John Woods Construction Corp., Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00436
Defendant:
Jerry and John Woods Construction Corp., Inc., Ray Charles Andrews, Jerry L. Wood and others
Plaintiff:
Maxum Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
