Cases 11 - 20 of 74
Richard Rogers v. Postmates, Inc.
as 20-16529
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD ROGERS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
POSTMATES, INC.
Yourfavorite.com et al v. Synapse Product Development, Inc et al
as 1:2020cv11211
Plaintiff:
Richard Rogers and Yourfavorite.com
Defendant:
Hillary Quirk and Synapse Product Development, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 20-1476
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10791
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Yourfavorite.com et al v. Federation of Exchange Accomodators et al
as 1:2020cv10649
Defendant:
Lynn Harkin, Toija J. Beutler, Andrew Gustafson and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Rogers and Yourfavorite.com
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Rogers et al v. SSNet, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv10289
Plaintiff:
Richard Rogers and Yourfavorite.com
Defendant:
SSNet, Inc., VCheck Solutions and Thomas J Walker
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Bloom et al v. City of Niagara Falls et al
as 1:2020cv00143
Plaintiff:
Faith E. Rivers, Richard Rogers, Jr., Frank Starks, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Occidental Chemical Corporation, Miller Springs Remediation Management, Inc., Glenn Springs Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Rogers v. Postmates Inc.
as 3:2019cv05619
Defendant:
Postmates Inc.
Plaintiff:
Richard Rogers
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Rogers v. Postmates Inc.
as 0:2019cv61877
Defendant:
Postmates Inc.
Plaintiff:
Richard Rogers
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
Rogers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv00585
Plaintiff:
Richard Rogers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
