Cases 11 - 20 of 94
Paxton v. Richmond City Justice Center
as 3:2022cv00277
Plaintiff:
Jamar Paxton, Jr.
Defendant:
Richmond City Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Northcraft v. Richmond City
as 2:2021cv00624
Petitioner:
Ronald Northcraft
Respondent:
Richmond City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Barrow v. Gary Williams
as 21-7593
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID JAMES BARROW
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY WILLIAMS, GARY T. SETTLE, HAROLD W. CLARKE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Northcraft v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 2:2021cv00606
Petitioner:
Ronald Northcraft
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia and Richmond City Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marla Crawford v. David Corrigan
as 21-1956
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DR. MARLA CRAWFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID PATRICK CORRIGAN and HARMAN, CLAYTOR, CORRIGAN, & WELLMAN
Defendant:
RICHMOND CITY SCHOOL BOARD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodall v. City of Richmond, et al.
as 3:2021cv00333
Plaintiff:
Erick Timothy Goodall
Defendant:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons, Richmond City Jail Detention, United States District Court Eastern District of Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Keon Hill v. Richmond City Justice Center
as 21-6767
Defendant / Appellee:
7 UNKNOWN NAMED NURSES, Nurses/Medical, MAJ HUNT, Major of Jail, NURSE ANDREWS, R/N and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEON SHAUNTEL HILL
SPRAWLDEF, et al v. City of Richmond, et al
as 20-17503
Respondent / Appellee:
UPSTREAM POINT MOLATE, LLC, GUIDIVILLE RANCHERIA OF CALIFORNIA, an Indian tribe, RICHMOND CITY COUNCIL, in their official capacities and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
TONY SUSTAK, PAMELA STELLO, PAUL CARMAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
