Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Butler v. Richmond City Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Ze'Nya Y. Butler
Defendant:
Richmond City Police Department, Richmond City Police Internal Affairs and The Office of Richmond City Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Campbell v. Richmond City Justice Center et al
as 2:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Daniel Scott Campbell
Defendant:
Richmond City Justice Center, Officer Tylor and Officer Mertaugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Richmond City Justice Center
as 3:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Horace Johnson
Defendant:
Richmond City Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benbow v. Richmond City Jail et al
as 3:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Michael Robert Benbow
Defendant:
Richmond City Jail, Lt. J. Brown and Deputy S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamar Paxton, Jr. v. Richmond City Justice Center
as 22-6800
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMAR PAXTON, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHMOND CITY JUSTICE CENTER
Jamar Paxton, Jr. v. Richmond City Justice Center
as 22-6797
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMAR PAXTON, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHMOND CITY JUSTICE CENTER, Staff
Jamar Paxton, Jr. v. Richmond City Justice Center
as 22-6788
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMAR PAXTON, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHMOND CITY JUSTICE CENTER
Paxton v. Richmond City Justice Center Staff
as 3:2022cv00408
Plaintiff:
Jamar Paxton
Defendant:
Richmond City Justice Center Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Richmond City Justice Center
as 1:2022cv00488
Plaintiff:
Troy Lemont Reed
Defendant:
Richmond City Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paxton v. Richmond City Justice Center
as 3:2022cv00358
Plaintiff:
Jamar Paxton
Defendant:
Richmond City Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
