Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 116
Thomas v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv12983
Defendant: Walmart Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Ronald Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Drakos II v. Fagan
as 4:2023cv00111
Petitioner: Ronald Thomas Drakos II
Respondent: Eric Fagan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thomas v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00045
Plaintiff: Ronald Thomas
Defendant: C R BARD, Davol Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Thomas (Gladimir Thomas)
as 23-6008
Defendant: RONALD THOMAS, Daddy, Roco and others
Defendant / Appellant: GLADIMIR THOMAS, Sleep and Sleep Boss
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ronald ThomasIn re: Ronald Thomas
as 22-20466
Petitioner: In re: Ronald Thomas
USA v. Ronald Thomas
as 22-12734
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: RONALD CARL THOMAS, a.k.a. Ronald Thomas
Thomas v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2022cv11636
Plaintiff: Ronald Thomas
Defendant: United States Postal Service and United States
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Drakos v. Fagen
as 4:2022cv01854
Petitioner: Robert Thomas Drakos, II and Ronald Thomas Drakos, II
Respondent: Eric Fagen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Drakos v. Fagan
as 4:2022cv01765
Plaintiff: Ronald Thomas Drakos, II
Defendant: Eric Fagan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wooten v. Federal Medical Center Lexington We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00052
Plaintiff: Ronald Thomas Wooten
Defendant: Federal Medical Center Lexington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?