Cases 11 - 20 of 134
Matthews v. Butler County et al
as 1:2022cv00380
Plaintiff:
Estate of Cody Bohanan and Victoria Matthews
Defendant:
Butler County, Sheriff Richard K Jones, Medical Director Dr. Anthony Abdullah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RUHL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12189
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN DAVID RUHL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ruhl v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00589
Plaintiff:
Christine Gale Ruhl
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of Social Security Decision (SSID)
Ruhl v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION;
as 2:2022mc00135
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Ruhl
Defendant:
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION;
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04978
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Lovejoy v. Greene et al
as 3:2022cv03080
Plaintiff:
Laurence Lovejoy
Defendant:
Brittany Greene, Rob Jeffreys and Hill Ruhl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lovejoy v. Watson et al
as 3:2022cv03032
Plaintiff:
Laurence Lovejoy
Defendant:
Cameron Watson, Justin Hammers, Brittany Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salinas v. State of Illinois et al
as 4:2022cv04019
Plaintiff:
Everardo Salinas
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Illinois Department of Corrections, Rob Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Ruhl
as 21-2892
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jeremiah Ruhl
Rouse et al v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 5:2021cv12670
Plaintiff:
Arthur J. Rouse, John Moore, David Sarfo and others
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board, State of Michigan, MDOC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
