Cases filed in California
Cases 11 - 20 of 73
Jess D Brasuell, III v. San Luis Obispo Public Defenders Office et al
as 2:2019cv10438
Defendant: San Luis Obispo County District Attorney, San Luis Obispo Public Defenders Office, San Luis Obispo Sheriffs Department and others
Plaintiff: Jess D Brasuell, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross Pepper et al v. San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv06022
Defendant: San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport, San Luis Obispo County, Federal Aviation Adminstration and others
Plaintiff: Ross Pepper and Lynda Pepper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Jess D Brasuell III v. San Luis Obispo County Adult Protective Service
as 2:2019cv03178
Defendant: San Luis Obispo County Adult Protective Service
Plaintiff: Jess D Brasuell, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Margo Benson-Hammer et al v. San Luis Obispo County et al
as 2:2019cv02790
Defendant: Tim Olivas, Ian Parkinson, San Luis Obispo County and others
Plaintiff: Margo Benson-Hammer and Estate of Russell Hammer
Estate Plaintiff: Russell Hammer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Planned Parenthood Federation of America et al v. Center for Medical Progress & BioMax et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019mc00056
Plaintiff: Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains, Planned Parenthood Center for Choice, Planned Parenthood Pasadena & San Gabriel Valley, Inc. and others
Defendant: David Daleiden and Center for Medical Progress & BioMax
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Jess D. Brasuell v. San Luis Obispo County Jail et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv02320
Defendant: San Luis Obispo County Superior Court, Superior Court Clerk of San Luis Obispo County, San Luis Obispo County Jail and others
Plaintiff: Jess D. Brasuell, III and Jess D Brasuell, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Planned Parenthood Federation of America et al v. Center for Medical Progress & BioMax et al
as 3:2019mc80042
Defendant: David Daleiden, Sandra Merritt, Biomax Procurement Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Planned Parenthood Center For Choice, Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast, Planned Parenthood Orange & San Bernardino Counties, Inc. and others
Respondent: StemExpress, LLC and Sarah Heuston
Receiver: Planned Parenthood: Shasta-Diablo, Inc. and Planned Parenthood: Shasta-Diablo, Inc. doing business as Planned Parenthood Northern California
Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc et al v. Center for Medical Progress et al
as 2:2019mc00010
Defendant: Sandra Susan Merritt, Center for Medical Progress, Biomax Procurement Services, LLC and others
Respondent: DV Biologics and DaVinci Biosciences
Plaintiff: Planned Parenthood Center for Choice, Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast, Planned Parenthood Rocky Mountains and others
Planned Parenthood Federation of America et al v. Center for Medical Progress & BioMax et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019mc00009
Plaintiff: Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains, Planned Parenthood Center for Choice, Planned Parenthood Pasadena & San Gabriel Valley, Inc. and others
Defendant: Troy Newman, Center for Medical Progress & BioMax, Gerardo Lopez Lopez and others
Receiver: Planned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo, Inc. and Planned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo, Inc. Doing business as Planned Parenthood Northern California
Respondent: StemExpress, LLC and Sarah Heuston
Planned Parenthood Federation of America et al v. Center for Medical Progress & BioMax
as 2:2019at00042
Plaintiff: Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains, Planned Parenthood Center for Choice, Planned Parenthood Pasadena & San Gabriel Valley, Inc. and others
Defendant: Troy Newman, Center for Medical Progress & BioMax, Gerardo Lopez Lopez and others
Receiver: Planned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo, Inc. and Planned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo, Inc. Doing business as Planned Parenthood Northern California

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?