Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Veloz v. Marshall County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2014cv00130
Plaintiff:
Giraldo Bersores Veloz
Defendant:
Marshall County Sheriff's Office, Norman Dalton, Sabrina Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Driver v. Fabish et al
as 3:2013cv01087
Plaintiff:
De'Mario Driver
Defendant:
Frank Fabish, Michael Ferrish, Jorge Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santiago et al v. Standard Candy Company, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00426
Plaintiff:
Alexander Santiago and Eric Giddens
Defendant:
Standard Candy Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Meraz v. El Charro Billiards, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv02812
Plaintiff:
Elmer Meraz
Defendant:
El Charro Billiards, LLC, Charlestowne Properties, LLC, Santiago Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cristobal Lopez et al v. Fish et al
as 2:2011cv00113
Defendant:
Jimmy Carroll Fish, Walter Jackson Fish and Christine Fish Gilliam
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Cristobal Lopez , Magdaleno Lorenzo Roman Perez , Octavio Carlos Baro Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Castro v. Northern Asset Management, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv00022
Plaintiff:
Joy Castro
Defendant:
Northern Asset Management, LLC and Frank Santiago
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Almanza et al v. Baird Tree Company, Inc
as 3:2010cv00311
Plaintiff:
Mario Almanza , Jesus Castaneda , Fornando Sendano Gonzalez and others
Defendant:
Baird Tree Company, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Solis v. United States of America
as 2:2008cv02828
Petitioner:
Santiago Solis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Santiago v. USA
as 2:2008cv00239
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Rueben Santiago
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Santiago v. USA
as 2:2008cv00230
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Abel Santiago
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
