Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 111
Scott Witzke v. Michael Bouchard, et al
as 23-1555
Plaintiff / Appellant: SCOTT ANDREW WITZKE
Defendant / Appellee: MICHAEL J. BOUCHARD, Oakland County Sheriff, THOMAS VIDA, JR., Oakland County Commander of Corrective Services Division and JOHN DOE, Unknown individuals employed by Oakland County and State of Michigan
US v. Andrew Wilson
as 22-7422
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: ANDREW SCOTT WILSON, a/k/a Scott Andrew Wilson
Scott WitzkeIn re: Scott Witzke
as 23-1447
Petitioner: In re: SCOTT ANDREW WITZKE
(HC) Morrison v. Acquisto We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00559
Petitioner: Scott Andrew Morrison
Respondent: Steven Acquisto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Witzke v. Bouchard et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv13070
Plaintiff: Scott Andrew Witzki and Scott Andrew Witzke [E-Filer]
Defendant: Michael J. Bouchard, Thomas Vida, Jr. and John Doe
Scott Witzke v. Michael Murphy
as 22-2027
Petitioner / Appellant: SCOTT ANDREW WITZKE
Respondent / Appellee: MICHAEL J. MURPHY, Livingston County, MI Sheriff's Department
WEISCOPE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22059
Plaintiff: SCOTT ANDREW WEISCOPE
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROBB v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv21660
Plaintiff: SCOTT ANDREW ROBB
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jamaal Cameron, et al v. Michael Bouchard, et al
as 22-1770
Plaintiff / Appellee: JAMAAL CAMERON, RICHARD BRIGGS, RAJ LEE and others
Petitioner / Appellant: SCOTT ANDREW WITZKE
Defendant / Appellee: MICHAEL BOUCHARD, CURTIS D. CHILDS and OAKLAND COUNTY, MI
BOWSER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14388
Plaintiff: SCOTT ANDREW BOWSER
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?