Cases 11 - 20 of 58
Matthew Griffin v. Nadine Bryant
as 21-7362
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW JAMES GRIFFIN
Defendant / Appellee:
NADINE J. BRYANT, P. M. MANNION, ARLENE BURGRESS TOODLE and others
Carter v. Dailey et al
as 1:2021cv02325
Plaintiff:
Joseph Scott Carter
Defendant:
Dailey, Fox, Grove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv86207
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY SCOTT CARTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv55833
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT CARTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv50258
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT CARTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jeremiah Petlig v. C. Harraway, et al
as 19-35672
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMIAH JAMES PETLIG
Defendant:
STANLEY LLOYD, SCOTT CARTER-ELDRED, KENT REGIONAL JUSTICE CENTER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
C. HARRAWAY, Officer
CARTER v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv02243
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
RICHARD SCOTT CARTER and RICHARD CARTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Petlig v. Carter-Eldred et al
as 2:2018cv00721
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah James Petlig
Defendant:
Scott Carter-Eldred, King County Prosecutor's Office, Kent Regional Justice Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Kirk et al
as 1:2018cv00595
Plaintiff:
Joseph Scott Carter
Defendant:
D. Kirk, Van Duren and Jacob Blount
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Meeker et al
as 1:2018cv00420
Plaintiff:
Joseph Scott Carter
Defendant:
Julie Meeker, John Scoleri and Lisa Toep
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
