Cases 11 - 20 of 62
Johnson v. King et al
as 3:2022cv00669
Plaintiff:
Ryan Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Scott King, Martha Dilmaghami, Philp Cambell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Batiste et al
as 2:2022cv01056
Plaintiff:
Erik King and Erik Scott King
Defendant:
John Batiste, Eric Cheney and Fusion Center OCIU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Travis King, et al v. Demichael Dews, et al
as 22-15743
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRAVIS SCOTT KING, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, Breana Raymundo and BREANNA RAYMUNDO
Defendant / Appellee:
DEMICHAEL DEWS, CALVIN NEE and JOHN TRAN
Defendant:
RONALD DAVIS, Warden
Collinge v. King
as 5:2022cv03095
Petitioner:
Adam B. Collinge
Respondent:
Scott King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
United States v. Jerome King
as 21-3363
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jerome Scott King
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv42347
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN SCOTT KING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv23872
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY SCOTT KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VASADI et al v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
as 2:2021cv10238
Plaintiff:
SCOTT TEITSCH, DANIELLE MOYER, JEAN VASADI and others
Defendant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv12209
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv37282
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
