Cases 11 - 20 of 92
LCS Group, LLC v. Shire LLC
as 19-2404
Defendant / Appellee:
Shire LLC, Shire Development LLC, Haug Partners LLP and others
Appellant:
Foundation Law Group LLP and Stephen M. Lobbin
Defendant:
Baker Hostetler, LLP
Plaintiff:
LCS Group, LLC
Shire Development LLC et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01696
Plaintiff:
Shire LLC, Shire US Inc. and Shire Development LLC
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals Industires Limited, Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticlas USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Picone, et al v. Shire US Inc., et al
as 19-8023
Not Yet Classified:
SHERRI CUMMINSFORD, SHIRE LLC, SHIRE US INC. and others
Interested Party:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.
Shire LLC et al v. KVK-Tech, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv10359
Plaintiff:
Shire LLC and Shire US Inc.
Defendant:
KVK-Tech, Inc. and Abhai, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. CEPHALON, INC.
as 2:2008cv02141
Intervenor:
PADDOCK LABORATORIES, INC., ASTRAZENECA PLC, URL PHARMA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant:
CEPHALON, INC.
Respondent:
MATTHEW PIKE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Intuniv Antitrust Litigation v. Shire LLC
as 6:2018mc00062
Petitioner:
Laurence F. Doud and Laurence F. Doud, III
In Re:
Intuniv Antitrust Litigation
Defendant:
Shire LLC
Respondent:
Shire PLC and Shire U.S. Inc.
SHIRE LLC et al v. ABHAI, LLC
as 2:2018mc00187
Plaintiff:
SHIRE LLC and SHIRE US INC.
Defendant:
ABHAI, LLC
Shire Development LLC et al v. SpecGx LLC
as 1:2018cv00800
Plaintiff:
Shire Development LLC , Shire LLC and Shire US Inc.
Defendant:
SpecGx LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Shire Development LLC et al v. Rhodes Pharmaceuticals L.P.
as 1:2017cv01840
Plaintiff:
Shire LLC, Shire US Inc. and Shire Development LLC
Defendant:
Rhodes Pharmaceuticals L.P.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
