Cases 11 - 15 of 15
Government Employees Insurance v. Moore, et al
as 10-1468
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, a Maryland corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
STACEY MOORE, Individually and as mother and next friend of Caleb Moore, CALEB MOORE, Individually and JEREMY VIALPANDO, Individually
Defendant:
DAVID L. BROWN and AMANDA L BROWN, Individually
McPeak v. Flint, City of et al
as 2:2010cv14110
Plaintiff:
David McPeak
Defendant:
Flint, City of , Mark Kloostra, Todd Pillsbury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Donnell, et al v. Robert Half International, Inc, et al
as 10-1809
Plaintiff - Appellee:
IAN O'DONNELL, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and DAVID JOLICOEUR, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
STACEY MOORE, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT HALF INTERNATIONAL, INC. and ROBERT HALF CORPORATION
Defendant:
ROBERT HALF OF BOSTON, INC., ROBERT HALF OF WORCESTER, INC. and ROBERT HALF PERSONNEL AGENCIES
Interested Party:
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
Government Employees Insurance Company v. Brown et al
as 1:2009cv02666
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Company
Defendant:
David L. Brown, Amanda L. Brown, Stacey (I) Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
O'Donnell, et al v. Robert Half International, Inc, et al
as 08-8019
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
IAN O'DONNELL, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, DAVID JOLICOEUR, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and STACEY MOORE, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
ROBERT HALF OF BOSTON, INC., ROBERT HALF OF WORCESTER, INC. and ROBERT HALF PERSONNEL AGENCIES
Defendant - Respondent:
ROBERT HALF INTERNATIONAL, INC. and ROBERT HALF CORPORATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
