Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02998
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Oppenheimer v. The ACL LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00023
Plaintiff:
David Oppenheimer
Defendant:
The ACL LLC and William Stacey Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Oppenheimer v. Moore et al
as 3:2019cv00024
Plaintiff:
David Oppenheimer
Defendant:
The ACL LLC and William Stacey Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
MOORE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv14426
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
STACEY MOORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOORE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2018cv01777
Defendant:
IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
STACEY MOORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Erhart et al v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 4:2017cv01996
Plaintiff:
Andrea Erhart , Stormi Knight , Amber Lambermont and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation , Bayer Healthcare LLC , Bayer Essure Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 5:2017cv00001
Plaintiff:
Stacey Moore
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Erhart et al v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv01946
Plaintiff:
Andrea Erhart , Stormi Knight , Amber Lambermont and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation , Bayer HealthCare LLC , Bayer Essure, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moseley et al v. Dallas County Detention Facility
as 5:2015cv00143
Plaintiff:
Garland Moseley, Vincent Belin, Antonio Harris and others
Defendant:
Dallas County Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
