Cases 11 - 19 of 19
BROWNE v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2016cv00619
Plaintiff:
ALBION SAVAGE BROWNE
Defendant:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MAINE CORRECTIONAL CENTER SECURITY STAFF and MEDICAL STAFF AND PROVIDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS EMPLOYEES/STAFF et al
as 1:2016cv00440
Plaintiff:
JAMIE BROWN
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS EMPLOYEES/STAFF, SAMANTHA K BROOKE SHEEHAN, ADRIANNE DILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUTCHINS v. SKOWHEGAN SAVING BANK et al
as 1:2016cv00280
Plaintiff:
BONNY LOU BUZZELL HUTCHINS
Defendant:
SKOWHEGAN SAVING BANK, ADAM & EVE HAIRCARE, COMMUNITY CRISIS COUNSELING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER v. NICHOLS et al
as 1:2013cv00259
Plaintiff:
SANDRA WALKER
Defendant:
RALPH NICHOLS, PATRICIA BARNHART, SCOTT BURNHEIMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STILE v. SOMERSET COUNTY et al
as 1:2013cv00248
Plaintiff:
JAMES STILE
Defendant:
SOMERSET COUNTY, SOMERSET COUNTY SHERIFF, DAVID ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NADEAU v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2010cv00249
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY B NADEAU
Defendant:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and CMS MEDICAL STAFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHULIKOV v. MAINE STATE PRISON STAFF
as 1:2007cv00153
Plaintiff:
NIKOLAY SHULIKOV
Defendant:
MAINE STATE PRISON STAFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLE v. CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2007cv00045
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J COLE
Defendant:
ME DEPT CORRECTIONS, ME COMMN CORRECTIONS, WARDEN, MAINE STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KELLY v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL'S SERVICE et al
as 2:2007cv00055
Plaintiff:
HOWARD DENNIS KELLY
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL DEPARTMENT STAFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
