Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv00634
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Neese v. Barr et al
as 7:2020cv00260
Defendant:
Thomas T. Cullen, Executive Office for United States Attorneys, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Ashley Brooke Neese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Medina-Hernandez v. Breckon et al
as 7:2019cv00454
Petitioner:
Zuriel Medina-Hernandez
Respondent:
The Federal Burea of Prisons, The United States Attorney General and M. Breckon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Labarge v. Breckon et al
as 7:2019cv00289
Petitioner:
Branden M. Labarge
Respondent:
The United States Attorney General, M. Breckon and The Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00113
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01611
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McLaughlin v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv00045
Plaintiff:
David C McLaughlin
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill, United States Attorney for the Western District of Virignia and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
John J. Buckshaw Agency v. Bobzien et al
as 1:2017cv01073
Plaintiff:
John J. Buckshaw Agency
Defendant:
David Bobzien, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raymond Morrogh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shipman v. Attorney General Of The United States et al
as 1:2017cv01058
Plaintiff:
Calvin V. Shipman
Defendant:
Attorney General Of The United States and United States Attorney For The Eastern District of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
