Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Reginald Williams v. Stroub, et al
as 12-14475
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINALD WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
STROUB, Dr. and TUCKER, Nurse
Stroub et al vs. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2012cv01944
Plaintiff:
Harry Stroub and Kathleen Stroub
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blocker v. Stroub et al
as 4:2012cv00062
Plaintiff:
Michael Christopher Blocker
Defendant:
John Stroub, Tatum and Betty Dean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blocker v. Stroub et al
as 1:2012cv00607
Plaintiff:
Michael Christopher Blocker
Defendant:
John Stroub, Rahul Garg, Redmond Regional Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Stroub et al
as 4:2011cv00206
Plaintiff:
Reginald Williams
Defendant:
Stroub, Tucker, April Brown Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blocker v. Howard et al
as 4:2011cv00201
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Blocker
Defendant:
Raymond Howard, Rahol Garg, Redmond Hospital (Rome, GA) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blocher v. Howard et al
as 4:2011cv00133
Plaintiff:
Michael Christopher Blocher
Defendant:
Raymond Howard, Rahul Garg, Redmond Hospital (Rome, GA) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blocher v. Howard et al
as 1:2011cv01297
Plaintiff:
Michael Christopher Blocher
Defendant:
Raymond Howard, Rahul Garg, Redmond Hospital (Rome, GA) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. Stroub et al
as 4:2011cv00102
Plaintiff:
James Cory Chambers
Defendant:
Kenneth John Stroub, Kenneth E. Sanford, Regina R. Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv04010
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
