Cases 11 - 20 of 63
Moore v. Ron Haynes, Superintendent of Stafford Creek Corrections Center
as 2:2021cv00217
Petitioner:
Don Arthur Moore
Respondent:
Ron Haynes, Superintendent of Stafford Creek Corrections Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ewalan v. Washington State DOC, et al
as 4:2021cv05030
Defendant:
Sergent Huggis, Adams, Lt Towel and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lochuch Ewalan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Booth v. Jackson
as 3:2020cv06264
Petitioner:
John Allen Booth
Respondent:
Superintendent of WSR and Eric Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Donahoe v. Donahoe et al
as 3:2020cv05388
Defendant:
Debbie Borchers, Trudi lnslee, Karl Hack and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Douglas Donahoe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Jones v. Superintendant
as 3:2020cv05386
Petitioner:
Meko Deaunt'e Jones, Sr
Respondent:
Superintendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crockett v. Haynes
as 3:2019cv06211
Petitioner:
James Ellis Crockett
Respondent:
Superintendent Ron Hayes and Ron Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Maier v. Snohomish County Jail et al
as 2:2019cv01963
Defendant:
Snohomish County Jail, Food Supervisor, Medical Supervisor and others
Plaintiff:
Michael-John Frederick Maier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Sinclair et al
as 2:2019cv01583
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Williams and James Anthony Washburn
Defendant:
Bruce C Gage, Deunnitis, Jewitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Firth et al
as 2:2019cv00900
Defendant:
Steven Jewitt, Kenneth Lauren, Jane Doe Davidson and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Moore and Leonard Lee Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cunningham v. Sheriff Superintendant of Jail (Spokane) et al
as 2:2019cv00050
Defendant:
Spokane County, Sheriff Superintendant of Jail (Spokane), Washington State and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Joseph Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
