Cases 11 - 20 of 676
Elmore v. Does
as 4:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
Does Employed by Arkansas Division of Correction, Benny Magness, John Felts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Putney v. Huntsman et al
as 1:2024cv01021
Plaintiff:
Stedrick L Putney, Sr
Defendant:
Tad Huntsman, Frank Spain, Prosecuting Attorney Sandra Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Putney v. Huntsman et al
as 4:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Stedrick L Putney, Sr
Defendant:
Tad Huntsman, Frank Spain, Sandra Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry v. Shuler
as 4:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Dermain Detorio Terry
Defendant:
Kathern Shuler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Givens v. Gore et al
as 4:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Terry M Givens
Defendant:
Gore, Dowdy, Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry v. Knodel
as 4:2023cv01076
Plaintiff:
Dermain Datorio Terry
Defendant:
Mike Knodel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swanigan v. Payne et al
as 4:2023cv01024
Plaintiff:
Terry Swanigan
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Mayfield, Musselwhite and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Woods et al
as 4:2023cv00982
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamar McCoy
Defendant:
Lafayette Woods, Jr, Hudson, Tompkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Robinson v. Crittenden County et al
as 2:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
Kendrick D Robinson
Defendant:
Crittenden County, Kelsie Rogers, Terry Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
McGill v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 5:2023cv05159
Plaintiff:
Terri McGill
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
