Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 195
American Hyperion Solar, LLC v. Inxeption Corporation
as 3:2023cv00377
Counter Defendant: American Hyperion Solar, LLC
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Inxeption Corporation
3Rd Party Defendant: Runergy PV Technology (Thailand) Co., Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Freedom Patents LLC v. TPV Technology Ltd. et al
as 4:2023cv00422
Defendant: TPV Technology Ltd., TPV Technology Co., Ltd., Top Victory Investments, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff: Freedom Patents LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Grumpy Cat Limited v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
as 1:2023cv00701
Plaintiff: Grumpy Cat Limited
Defendant: The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, GearLass, Changsha Wang Yanjun Trading Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Sri Trang Gloves Thailand Public Company Limited v. Pacific Apex Partnership LLC et al
as 2:2022cv09114
Plaintiff: Sri Trang Gloves (Thailand) Public Company Limited and Sri Trang Gloves Thailand Public Company Limited
Defendant: PACIFIC APEX PARTNERSHIP LLC, SHANN LINN and Shann Lin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company et al v. Ceva Logistics Singapore PTE LTD. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv04561
Plaintiff: Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, Goodyear Orient Company, LTD, Navigators Insurance Company, Inc. and others
Defendant: CEVA LOGISTICS SINGAPORE PTE LTD., CEVA FREIGHT LLC., PYRAMID LINES SINGAPORE PTE LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company Of America, et al v. M/V One Apus, et al
as 1:2022cv08233
Plaintiff: Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company Of America,, Affliated FM Insurance Company, Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty and others
Defendant: One, BDP Transport Inc., HMM and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Danmar Lines
Cross Claimant: Transpac Cargoline, New Chain Logistics Co Ltd, Samsung SDS Co Ltd and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: M/V ONE APUS, IMO no. 9806079, including its engines, boilers, tackle, and other appurtenances, etc., in rem
Cross Defendant: Roes 1-10
3Rd Party Defendant: Orient Overseas Container Line, M/V One Apus in rem, ECU Worldwide and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30701 Marine Cargo Loss or Damage - Liability of Water Carriers
UPS Asia Group PTE. Ltd. et al v. Solaray, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv06990
Debtor: Tyco Electronics Mexico S De RL De CV
Plaintiff: UPS Asia Group PTE. Ltd., UPS Ocean Freight Services, Inc., UPS SCS (China) Ltd. and others
Defendant: Solaray, LLC, Dongguan Grand Fly Display Ltd, The Hanover Insurance Company a/s/o Progressive Dynamics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30701 Marine Cargo Loss or Damage - Liability of Water Carriers
O&M HALYARD, INC. v. SRI TRANG USA, INC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00622
Plaintiff: O&M HALYARD, INC.
Defendant: SRI TRANG USA, INC, SRI TRANG GLOVES (THAILAND) PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED, SRI TRANG ARGO-INDUSTRY PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Jurcev v. Citibank, N.A. et al
as 2:2022cv03754
Plaintiff: Adriana Jurcev
Defendant: Citibank, N.A., Bank of Thailand, Ltd., Bangkok Bank Public Company, Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Flextronics International USA, Inc. v. TDK Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv02798
Plaintiff: Flextronics International USA, Inc.
Defendant: TDK Corporation, Magnecomp Precision Technology Public Co. Ltd., SAE Magnetics (H.K.) Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?