Cases 11 - 20 of 2,331
SULLIVAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. SULLIVAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00518
Petitioner:
JALEN DAVIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Drake v. USA
as 1:2024cv00153
Petitioner:
Jalen S Drake
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Henry v. USA
as 1:2024cv00143
Petitioner:
Adam Henry
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
COUCH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv00608
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. COUCH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ANDERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00403
Petitioner:
CAROLYN ANDERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ANDERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00405
Petitioner:
TODD ANDERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Chaidez et al v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Matthew Chaidez, Stephanie Perez, Matthew Chaidez and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Krouse et al v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mills Krouse, Paige E. Krouse and Daniel Mills Krouse 1989 Trust UAD December 26, 1989
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Randle v. The United States of America
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Payne T Randle
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
