Cases 11 - 20 of 39
(HC) Sanders v. Marshall
as 1:2020cv00002
Petitioner:
Troy Alexander Sanders
Respondent:
G. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Troy Sanders v. Grimes, et al
as 19-16574
Defendant / Appellee:
HENRY, Correctional Officer, LUCAS, Correctional Officer and GRIMES, Correctional Officer
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TROY ALEXANDER SANDERS
Teresita Canuto v. Troy Alexander, et al
as 19-5186
Defendant / Appellee:
Richard V. Spencer, Secretary of Navy, Woodman-Sylvan Properties, Inc., Bank of America N.A. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Teresita A. Canuto
(PC) Sanders v. Grimes, et al.
as 1:2018cv01285
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Grimes, Correctional Officer Henry and Correctional Officer Lucas
Plaintiff:
Troy Alexander Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Troy Alexander Sanders v. Grimes et al
as 2:2018cv07969
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Grimes, Grimes, Correctional Officer Henry and others
Plaintiff:
Troy Alexander Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
as 3:2018cv04620
Plaintiff:
Troy Alexander Richardson
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richardson v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
as 4:2018cv04620
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Plaintiff:
Troy Alexander Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Alexander v. City of Syracuse et al
as 5:2017cv01195
Plaintiff:
Troy Alexander
Defendant:
City of Syracuse, County of Onondaga, Detective Gilhooley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Troy Bertling v. Chris Moody
as 17-72097
Petitioner:
TROY ALEXANDER BERTLING
Respondent:
CHRIS MOODY, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
