Cases 11 - 20 of 20
MERRITT v. BOLMAN et al
as 2:2012cv00959
Plaintiff:
DAVID MERRITT
Defendant:
BOLMAN, FARLEY, JP NAJEO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JORDAN et al v. THE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
as 2:2012cv02802
Plaintiff:
LEE ROY JORDAN , RANDY WHITE , RAYFIELD WRIGHT and others
Defendant:
THE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TUBBE et al v. A C & S, INC et al
as 2:2011cv61770
Plaintiff:
I D TUBBE and BETTY TUBBE
Defendant:
A C & S, INC , CELOTEX CORP , FIBREBOARD CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TUBB v. OFFICER JAMES MASOTTA
as 2:2009cv01525
Plaintiff:
MARY E. TUBB
Defendant:
OFFICER JAMES MASOTTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
TUBBS v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv77001
Plaintiff:
CHAREL D. TUBBS
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
TUBBS v. A&M INSULATION CO et al
as 2:2008cv91174
Plaintiff:
HAVEN TUBBS
Defendant:
A&M INSULATION CO, AC AND S INC, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
TUBBS et al v. CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv90699
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY TUBBS and GAIL TUBBS
Defendant:
CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY, GARLOCK INC, GARLOCK INC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
TUBBS v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv75677
Plaintiff:
P TUBBS
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
TUBBS v. ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv72782
Plaintiff:
FLOYD T. TUBBS
Defendant:
ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC., AEROQUUIP INTERNATIONAL, INC., AEROQUIP CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BROOM et al v. HOGAN et al
as 2:2003cv20587
Defendant:
JIM C. BARRETT, SHERIFF GLEN WARREN, SARA B. SCHRADER and others
Plaintiff:
GLADYS MEDRANO, ROBIN HOSEY, DONNA HORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
