Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Construction Industry Laborers Pension Fund et al v. Freeman Concrete Construction, LLC
as 4:2020cv00366
Defendant:
Freeman Concrete Construction, LLC
Plaintiff:
Reginald L. Thomas, Jason Mendenhall, Greater Kansas City Laborers Vacation Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Construction Industry Laborers Pension Fund et al v. CBS Piling Solutions, Inc.
as 4:2020cv00299
Plaintiff:
Reginald L. Thomas, Jason Mendenhall, Mathew J Bowen and others
Defendant:
CBS Piling Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131
Construction Industry Laborers Pension Fund et al v. Lan-Tel Communications Services, Inc.
as 4:2019cv00276
Plaintiff:
Bridgette Williams, Kevin Fahey, Construction Industry Laborers Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Lan-Tel Communications Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Construction Industry Laborers Pension Fund et al v. Jessie's Quality Concrete Co. et al
as 4:2018cv00875
Defendant:
Daniel R Jones and Jessie's Quality Concrete Co.
Plaintiff:
Kevin Fahey, mitchell rowley, Construction Industry Laborers Training Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Construction Industry Laborers Pension Fund et al v. O'Donnell-Way Construction Company, Inc.
as 4:2017cv00247
Plaintiff:
Construction Industry Laborers Pension Fund , Construction Industry Laborers Welfare Fund , Greater Kansas City Laborers Vacation Plan and others
Defendant:
O'Donnell-Way Construction Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Construction Industry Laborers Pension Fund et al v. Hardt Enterprises, LLC
as 4:2017cv00116
Plaintiff:
Construction Industry Laborers Pension Fund , Construction Industry Laborers Welfare Fund , Greater Kansas City Laborers Vacation Plan and others
Defendant:
Hardt Enterprises, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Construction Industry Laborers Pension Fund et al v. Custom Concrete Innovations, LLC
as 4:2016cv00897
Plaintiff:
Construction Industry Laborers Pension Fund , Construction Industry Laborers Welfare Fund , Greater Kansas City Laborers Vacation Plan and others
Defendant:
Custom Concrete Innovations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Ira/Ro v. Franklin Resources, Inc. et al
as 1:2004cv01310
Plaintiff:
Hugh Sharkey Ira/Ro and Deferred Compensation Plan for Employees of Nassau County
Defendant:
Franklin Resources, Inc., Franklin Advisers, Inc., Franklin/Templeton Distributors, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Trustees of the Ironworkers Local Union No.16 Pension Plan; Trustees of the Ironworkers Local Union No.16 Health Fund; Trustees of the Ironworkers Local No.16 Annuity Plan;Trustees of the Ironworkers Local No. 16 etc.etal v Quality Walls & Windows et
as 1:2007cv02503
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Ironworkers Local Union No. 16 Pension Plan; Trustees of the Ironworkers Local Union No. 16 Health Fund; Trustees of the Ironworkers Local No. 16 Annuity Plan; and Trustees of the Iron, Trustees of the Ironworkers Industry Advancement Fund, Institute of the Ironworking Industry and others
Defendant:
Quality Walls & Windows, Inc. and Kevin C. Bowens
Garnishee:
BB&T Bank, Forrester Construction Company, The Poole and Kent Corporation and others
Petitioner:
Global Serve, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Trustees of the Ironworkers Local Union No. 16 Pension Plan; Trustees of the Ironworkers Local No. 16 Helath Fund; Trustees of the Ironworkers Local No. 16 Annuity Plan; and Trustees of the Ironworker et al v. Ted Turner Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv01691
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Ironworkers Local Union No. 16 Pension Plan; Trustees of the Ironworkers Local Union No. 16 Health Fund; Trustees of the Ironworkers Local No. 16 Annuity Plan; and Trustees of the Iron, Trustees of the Ironworkers Industry Advancement Fund, Institute of the Ironworking Industry and others
Defendant:
Ted Turner Company, Inc. and Ted Turner
Garnishee:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
