Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Norcal Tea Party Patriots et al v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2015mc00337
Movant:
Americans Against Oppressive Laws, Inc., Faith and Freedom Coalition of Ohio, Norcal Tea Party Patriots and others
Plaintiff:
Americans Against Oppressive Laws, Inc., Faith and Freedom Coalition of Ohio, Norcal Tea Party Patriots and others
Defendant:
Steven F. Bolling, John Does, Bonnie Esrig and others
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Norcal Tea Party Patriots et al v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2015mc00338
Plaintiff:
Americans Against Oppressive Laws, Inc., Faith and Freedom Coalition of Ohio, Norcal Tea Party Patriots and others
Defendant:
Steven F. Bolling, John Does, Bonnie Esrig and others
Movant:
Citizens for Self-Governance
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Stop R.E.I.D. v. Federal Election Commission
as 15-1455
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STOP RECKLESS ECONOMIC INSTABILITY CAUSED BY DEMOCRATS, ("Stop Reid"), NIGER INNIS, NIGER INNIS FOR CONGRESS and others
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMERICAN FUTURE PAC
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
Minnesota Voters Alliance, et al v. Mark Ritchie
as 15-1741
Plaintiff:
Minnesota Majority
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Minnesota Voters Alliance, Minnesota Northstar Tea Party Patriots, Election Integrity Watch and others
Defendant:
Joe Mansky, in his official capacity as the Elections Manager for Ramsey County, Virginia Gelms, in her individual and official capacity as the Elections Manager for Hennepin County, Mike Freeman, in his official capacity as Hennepin County Attorney and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Mark Ritchie, in his official capacity as Secretary of State
Minnesota Voters Alliance, et al v. Mark Ritchie
as 15-1741
Plaintiff:
Minnesota Majority
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Minnesota Voters Alliance, Minnesota Northstar Tea Party Patriots, Election Integrity Watch and others
Defendant:
Joe Mansky, in his official capacity as the Elections Manager for Ramsey County, Virginia Gelms, in her individual and official capacity as the Elections Manager for Hennepin County, Mike Freeman, in his official capacity as Hennepin County Attorney and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Steve Simon, in his official capacity as Secretary of State
Minnesota Voters Alliance, et al v. Joe Mansky, et al
as 15-1682
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Minnesota Majority, Minnesota Voters Alliance, Minnesota Northstar Tea Party Patriots and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Joe Mansky, in his official capacity as the Elections Manager for Ramsey County, Virginia Gelms, in her individual and official capacity as the Elections Manager for Hennepin County, Mike Freeman, in his official capacity as Hennepin County Attorney and others
Linchpins of Liberty, et al v. USA, et al
as 15-5013
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Linchpins of Liberty, Patriots Educating Concerned Americans Now, Greenwich Tea Party Patriots of South Jersey, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service, Jacob J. Lew, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Treasury and others
TEA PARTY PATRIOTS, INC. v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2014cv00615
Plaintiff:
TEA PARTY PATRIOTS, INC.
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Stop Reckless Economic Instability Caused By Democrats et al v. Federal Election Commission
as 1:2014cv00397
Plaintiff:
Stop Reckless Economic Instability Caused By Democrats , Niger Innis , Niger Innis for Congress and others
Defendant:
Federal Election Commission
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 437 Federal Election Commission
David Jeep v. The Tea Party/GOP/Republicans, et al
as 14-1344
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David Gerard Jeep
Defendant - Appellee:
The Tea Party/GOP/Republicans, John Boehner, Republican Speaker of the House and Mitch McConnell, Republican Minoritty Leader
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
