Cases 11 - 20 of 65
FULLER v. ROYSTER et al
as 1:2022cv00190
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN A. FULLER
Defendant:
TED S. ROYSTER, ALLEN B. MARTIN and TIMOTHY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buck v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 5:2019ct03100
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Michael Williams, D. Johnston and others
Plaintiff:
Darryl Buck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
LaBreche v. Chambers et al
as 1:2021cv00271
Plaintiff:
Andrew LaBreche
Defendant:
David Chambers, Tommy Davis, Robert Martelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HMS Holdings, LLC v. Herford et al
as 3:2021cv00460
Plaintiff:
HMS Holdings LLC and HMS Holdings Limited Partnership
Defendant:
Robert J. Herford, Ted A. Greve & Associates, P.A. and Britt Nichlaus Caulder
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Ross v. Scarantino et al
as 5:2020ct03355
Defendant:
P.A. M. Van Sickle, Dr. S. Ted Shalkewitz, C. Daniels and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio M. Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Haggins v. LNU et al
as 3:2020cv00376
Defendant:
Adam Jones, Ted LNU, Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Haggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owen v. FDA Office of Generic Drugs et al
as 1:2020cv00098
Plaintiff:
Ted Jackson Owen
Defendant:
FDA Office of Generic Drugs, Norman Sharpless, Howard Chazin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2016cv00030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thornton v. US Department of Justice et al
as 5:2019ct03095
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Michael Williams, D. Johnston and others
Plaintiff:
Donte T. Thornton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
