Cases 11 - 20 of 1,891
Chapman v. City of Coos Bay, et al.
as 24-4972
Defendant:
PETER EMERSON KIRK, GARRY MCCULLOUGH, CHRISTOPHER CHAPANAR and others
Plaintiff:
ALLISON KATE CHAPMAN
Kyte, et al v. State of Colorado, et al
as 24-1319
Defendant:
DENVER HEALTH, STATE OF OREGON and STATE OF COLORADO
Plaintiff:
MEGAN KYTE
Bedford v. WellPath et al
as 6:2024cv01316
Defendant:
Douglas County Jail, WellPath, State of Oregon and others
Plaintiff:
John Curtis Bedford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. Douglas County Jail et al
as 6:2024cv01272
Defendant:
WellPath, Douglas County Jail and State of Oregon
Plaintiff:
Marcus E. Dawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George v. Douglas County Jail et al
as 6:2024cv01260
Plaintiff:
Robert James George
Defendant:
Douglas County Jail, State of Oregon and N. Heuberger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quintero, et al. v. City of Medford, et al.
as 24-4688
Defendant:
COUNTY OF JACKSON, a political subdivision of the State of Oregon, BEN LYTLE, in his capacity as an individual, RYAN GROOM, in his capacity as an individual and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN QUINTERO, RV MAIN, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company and AUSTEN LETRICK
Krivosheenko v. Beamer et al
as 3:2024cv01179
Defendant:
Warren Roberts, State of Oregon, Leland Beamer and others
Plaintiff:
Denis Krivosheenko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
State of Washington v. FERC
as 24-60354
Petitioner:
State of Washington and State of Oregon
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Kyte (PS) v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2024cv01944
Defendant:
State of Colorado, State of Oregon and Denver Health
Plaintiff:
Megan Kyte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holten v. State of Oregon
as 3:2024cv01101
Petitioner:
Jaycob Patrick Holten
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
