Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Kittredge et al v. Navy Federal Credit Union
as 3:2015cv00081
Plaintiff:
Robert Bruce Kittredge, Jr. and Thomas H. Fluharty
Defendant:
Navy Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00207
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00209
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00208
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00087
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Fluharty et al v. City of Clarksburg
as 1:2014cv00027
Plaintiff:
Thomas H. Fluharty , Diana R. Jacquez and Thomas J. Jacquez
Defendant:
City of Clarksburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman et al v. Quicken Loans, Inc. et al
as 5:2013cv00068
Plaintiff:
Thomas H. Fluharty , D. Kevin Coleman and Diane M. Coleman
Defendant:
Quicken Loans, Inc. , Title Source, Inc. and Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1204
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00006
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1652
Debtor - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.