Cases 11 - 20 of 82
Peete v. Copeskey et al
as 2:2022cv00484
Plaintiff:
Christopher Peete
Defendant:
Kim Copeskey, Michael Gollinger, Neil Thoreson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodland v. Ross et al
as 2:2021cv01368
Plaintiff:
Corey Woodland
Defendant:
Christine Ross, Dionna Clemmons, Neil Thoreson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peter Thoreson v. Sawyer County, Wisconsin, et al
as 21-1437
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PETER J. THORESON
Defendant / Appellant:
JAYMES POPLIN, investigator, individually and in his official capacity, KEVIN GILLIS, Deputy, indidivually and in his official capacity and SAWYER COUNTY, WISCONSIN
THORESON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv04402
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TY THORESON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schuenke et al v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv00186
Respondent:
Sarah Watson, Thoreson Niel, Wisconsin Department of Corrections and others
Petitioner:
Donna M Aiello and Lloyd T Schuenke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thoreson, Peter v. Poplin, Jaymes et al
as 3:2019cv00998
Defendant:
Sawyer County Sheriff's Department, Ernest Ziemer, Kevin Gillis and others
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Thoreson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Thoreson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv04992
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ronald Thoreson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IMO 2019 Attorney Mass Suspension
as 2:2019mc00090
In Re:
Danuta B. Panich, Kenneth L. Sales, Scott J. Lennox and others
James White v. Mark Pazin, et al
as 19-15793
Defendant:
JOE SCOTT, Commander at Merced County Sheriff's Department, BLODGETT, Sergeant at Merced County Sheriff's Department, MARK N. PAZIN, Sheriff/Coroner (Sheriff Administration) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES E. WHITE
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF MERCED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
