Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Smith et al v. State of South Carolina State Election Commission, The et al
as 3:2012cv01543
Plaintiff:
Ann Smith , Tommie Reece , John Pettigrew and others
Defendant:
State of South Carolina State Election Commission, The and South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Tinsley v. FCI Bennettsville et al
as 8:2012cv00264
Plaintiff:
Kevin Tinsley
Defendant:
FCI Bennettsville, M Snuggs, R McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tinsley v. State of South Carolina
as 6:2011cv02777
Petitioner:
Henry Tinsley
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tinsley v. Mauney
as 2:2011cv01121
Petitioner:
James Douglas Tinsley, II
Respondent:
Robert H Mauney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RFT Management Company LLC v. Gilbert et al
as 8:2010cv02503
Plaintiff:
RFT Management Company LLC
Defendant:
William E Gilbert, Stephen Gilbert, Jan Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Tinsley v. Wight et al
as 7:2009cv02455
Plaintiff:
James Douglas Tinsley
Defendant:
Brian Wight, R Bogan, Chuck Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mode et al v. Aqua-Chem Inc et al
as 0:2009cv00882
Plaintiff:
Gerald Tinsley Mode and Susan R Mode
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem Inc, Borg Warner Morse TEC Inc, Certainteed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Barfield et al v. Norfolk Southern Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv00095
Plaintiff:
Susie A Barfield, Tommy G Barton, Sr, Charles R Beard and others
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Corporation, Jimmy Thornton and Mike Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Tinsley v. Singleton et al
as 8:2008cv00532
Plaintiff:
James D Tinsley, III
Defendant:
James Singleton, Greg Reed, David Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
