Cases 11 - 20 of 163
Abrams v. Ishee
as 1:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Larry Abrams
Respondent:
Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ellis v. Ishee et al
as 5:2024ct03067
Plaintiff:
Samuel Ellis
Defendant:
Todd Ishee and Susan Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JUMPER v. ISHEE et al
as 1:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
RICHARD D. JUMPER, JR.
Defendant:
TODD ISHEE, PETER BUCHHOLTZ, KENO WHITE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. McMillian et al
as 5:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Albert Anderson
Defendant:
FNU McMillian, Eric Dye, Jeffrey Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chambers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Chambers
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Kimberly D. Grande, Larry Williamson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. ISHEE
as 1:2024cv00182
Petitioner:
SIMARON D. HILL
Respondent:
TODD ISHEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Safrit v. Ishee
as 1:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Matthew Aaron Safrit
Respondent:
Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hinton v. United States Incorporated et al
as 3:2024cv00208
Petitioner:
Charles E. Hinton
Respondent:
United States Incorporated, Roy A. Cooper, Todd Ishee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parsons v. Director N.C. D.P.S. et al
as 5:2024ct03039
Plaintiff:
Daniel B. Parsons
Defendant:
Director N.C. D.P.S., Ms. La'Floor, Todd Ishee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noonsab v. Ishee
as 5:2024hc02018
Plaintiff:
Somchai Noonsab
Defendant:
Commissioner of Pris Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
