Cases 11 - 20 of 62
DEFOGGI v. UNTIED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv03889
Respondent:
UNTIED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY R. DEFOGGI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Page Penk v. William Barr
as 20-5061
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Page David Penk
Defendant / Appellee:
William Pelham Barr, The Honorable Attorney General for the Untied States of America
USA v. THE SEARCH OF INFORMATION ASSOCIATED WITH THE CELLULAR TELEPHONE ASSIGNED CALL NUMBER (301) 586-2431, THAT IS STORED AT PREMISES CONTROLLED BY SPRINT CORPORATION et al
as 1:2020sc00590
Defendant:
THE SEARCH OF INFORMATION ASSOCIATED WITH THE CELLULAR TELEPHONE ASSIGNED CALL NUMBER (301) 586-2431, THAT IS STORED AT PREMISES CONTROLLED BY SPRINT CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
UNTIED STATES OF AMERICA
Beltran v. Untied States of America
as 20-665
Petitioner / Appellant:
Javier Beltran
Respondent / Appellee:
Untied States of America
Darius Ward v. Untied States of America
as 2:2020cv01632
Plaintiff:
Darius Ward
Defendant:
Untied States of America and DOES 1 through 25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
David L. Keys v. Untied States of America et al
as 5:2019cv02384
Defendant:
D. Shirley, Untied States of America, Medical Unit and others
Plaintiff:
David L. Keys
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meece v. Barr et al
as 1:2019cv06965
Defendant:
Director Christopher A. Wray, William P. Barr, Regina Lombardo and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy C Meece
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Groschupf v. Untied States of America et al
as 9:2019cv00081
Plaintiff:
Doreen P. Groschupf
Defendant:
Untied States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Francisco Villa v. Untied States of America
as 5:2019cv00234
Petitioner:
Francisco Villa
Respondent:
Untied States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00234
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
