Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Snelling #262770 v. Heyns et al
as 1:2015cv01018
Plaintiff:
Thomas R. Snelling #262770
Defendant:
P. Klee, D. Ricumstrict, K. Salisbury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
T.R. v. Quality Home Maintenance Incorporated et al
as 2:2015cv00912
Plaintiff:
T.R.
Defendant:
Quality Home Maintenance Incorporated , Cory Holman , Unknown Holman and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Spearman #320836 v. Heyns et al
as 2:2015cv00015
Plaintiff:
Rufus L. Spearman #320836
Defendant:
Daniel H. Heyns, Richard D. Russell, Unknown Part(y)(ies) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thrasher v. Holman et al
as 3:2012cv00517
Plaintiff:
Christopher Thrasher
Defendant:
Unknown Holman and Deandrea Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sephus v. Miss. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 3:2011cv00658
Plaintiff:
Stephen Michael Sephus
Defendant:
Miss. Dept. of Corrections, Christopher Epps, Gloria Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winters v. Johnson et al
as 3:2011cv00597
Plaintiff:
Timothy Winters
Defendant:
M. Johnson, L. Brown, A. Patton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payton v. Holman et al
as 3:2011cv00541
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Payton
Defendant:
C.M.C.F. and Unknown Holman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thrasher v. CMCF et al
as 3:2011cv00482
Defendant:
CMCF and Unknown Holman
Plaintiff:
Christopher Howard Thrasher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Censke #10929-040 (Formerly MDOC #484602) v. Marquette, County of, et al
as 2:2011cv00119
Plaintiff:
Thomas Andrew Censke #10929-040 (Formerly MDOC #484602)
Defendant:
Marquette, County of, Michael Lovelace, Cheryl Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutherlin #271305 v. Derusha et al
as 2:2010cv00240
Plaintiff:
David Sutherlin #271305
Defendant:
Unknown Derusha, Unknown Patrick, Unknown Bonney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
