Cases 11 - 20 of 34
HIMCHAK v. SCI LAUREL HIGHLANDS et al
as 3:2019cv00084
Respondent:
SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL, ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH SHAPIRO, ATTORNEY ELLIOT SULCOVE and others
Petitioner:
WILLIAM A. HIMCHAK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
VAN HORN v. B & D BUILDERS, LLC
as 5:2018cv01279
Plaintiff:
LISA VAN HORN
Defendant:
B & D BUILDERS, LLC
Counter_claimant:
B & D BUILDERS, LLC
Counter_defendant:
LISA VAN HORN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Himchak v. Commonwealth of PA et al
as 1:2017cv01870
Petitioner:
William A. Himchak, III
Respondent:
Commonwealth of PA, Franklin County Courthouse, Carol Van Horn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
VAN HORN v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2017cv04269
Plaintiff:
ROBERT VAN HORN
Defendant:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HIMCHAK v. DYE et al
as 3:2016cv02436
Plaintiff:
William A. Himchak, III
Defendant:
Daniel Dye, CMNWLTH Of Pa - Pa State Police, Craig Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN HORN v. GLEN MILLS SCHOOLS
as 2:2015cv00203
Plaintiff:
THOMAS VAN HORN
Defendant:
GLEN MILLS SCHOOLS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
HIMCHAK v. DYE et al
as 1:2014cv02394
Plaintiff:
William A. Himchak, III
Defendant:
Daniel Dye, CMNWLTH Of Pa - Pa State Police, Craig Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HIMCHAK v. DYE et al
as 2:2014cv07024
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A. HIMCHAK, III
Defendant:
DANIEL DYE, CMNWLTH OF PA - PA STATE POLICE, CRAIG BOWMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAMBINO v. MEEKS et al
as 1:2014cv00236
Plaintiff:
DAVID A. GAMBINO
Defendant:
BOBBY MEEKS, H. BARRON, VAN HORN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATTHEWS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2014cv00024
Plaintiff:
DANIEL KEITH MATTHEWS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, CENTRAL MEDICAL REVIEW DIRECTOR, FPC MCKEAN HEALTH SERVICES ADMIN. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
