Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Lathrop-Vance v. Croft et al
as 2:2020cv01926
Defendant:
Dr. Garth Gulick, Brad Cain, Wagner and others
Plaintiff:
Johnathon Lee Lathrop-Vance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Probst v. Malheur County Circuit Court
as 2:2020cv00364
Plaintiff:
Julia Elaine Vance Probst
Defendant:
Malheur County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vance v. Sears Holdings Corporation et al
as 6:2019cv01275
Defendant:
MTD Products and Sears Holdings Corporation
Plaintiff:
Logan Harris Vance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Worden v. Kelly
as 6:2019cv00898
Respondent:
Superintendent Brandon Kelly
Petitioner:
Vance Wallace Worden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marcos-Chavela v. Maultsby et al
as 3:2019cv00835
Defendant:
Dallas Family Court, Ron & Madine Kirk, Vance & Beth Maultsby and others
Plaintiff:
Susan Marcos-Chavela
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Columbia Export Terminal, LLC v. The International Longshore and Warehouse Union et al
as 3:2018cv02177
Defendant:
James Holland, John Peak, Lawrence Thibedeau and others
Plaintiff:
Columbia Export Terminal, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Wilde v. Emerald Swimming Pools of Oregon, Inc. et al
as 6:2017cv01231
Defendant:
Emerald Swimming Pools of Oregon, Inc. and Vance D. Neely
Plaintiff:
Darrel Wilde
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216 Fair Labor Standards Act
Barber v. Vance et al
as 3:2016cv02105
Defendant:
Marie Atwood, State of Oregon and Meagan Alyssa Vance
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Barber
Unknown:
Donald J. Koehler, II and Rebecca Cambreleng
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. HSBC et. al.
as 3:2015cv00264
Defendant:
HSBC et. al.
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Vance Smith
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate
Riddle et al v. Mikels
as 1:2014cv01676
In Re:
Jesus Avelar Gomez
Respondent:
Marshall E Mikels
Petitioner:
Vance Riddle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
