Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Dillingham v. Virginia Dept. of Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv00358
Plaintiff:
James H Dillingham, III
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Hardy, Ann Vance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. Wilson
as 2:2015cv00349
Petitioner:
Donald Vance Peterson
Respondent:
Eric D. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones v. Richmond City Circuit Court et al
as 1:2015cv00008
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
Richmond City Circuit Court, Spotsylvania County Circuit Court, Stafford Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bridges v. Corizon Prison Health Management et al
as 3:2014cv00803
Plaintiff:
Wayne Jeffrey Bridges
Defendant:
Corizon Prison Health Management, Mohammad Siddiqui, Ann Vance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Liverman et al v. City of Petersburg et al
as 3:2014cv00139
Plaintiff:
Herbert E. Liverman and Vance R. Richards
Defendant:
City of Petersburg and John I. Dixon, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Funkhouser et al v. City of Portsmouth, Virginia
as 2:2013cv00520
Plaintiff:
Doug Funkhouser , Roberto S. Aguilar , Jeffrey Lloyd Barber and others
Defendant:
City of Portsmouth, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Brinkley v. Young et al
as 7:2012cv00243
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brinkley
Defendant:
Mr. Vance and Mr. Stan Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Engel v. Francis et al
as 3:2011cv00157
Plaintiff:
Brian Paul Engel
Defendant:
Francis, Covenant, Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Francis et al
as 1:2009cv00836
Plaintiff:
Richard W. Bell
Defendant:
Francis, Covenant, Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
